About 'georgetown bookstores'|...to agree with her. Maybe going down to Georgetown and getting her picture taken...the line. Politics and Prose is the best bookstore in the world. I have never seen that...
Ｓｅｃｒｅｔ ｐｏｌｉｃｅ, ｌｉｂｒａｒｙ ｒｅｃｏｒｄ ｓｕｒｖｅｉｌｌａｎｃｅ, ｗｉｒｅｔａｐｐｉｎｇ ａｎｄ ｆｏｒｃｅｄ ｄｅｔｅｎｔｉｏｎ, ａｌｌ ｄｏｎｅ ｉｎ ｓｅｃｒｅｃｙ, ｓｅｅｍｓ ｌｉｋｅ ａ ｈｏｒｒｏｒ ｒｅｓｅｒｖｅｄ ｆｏｒ ｏｔｈｅｒ ｃｏｕｎｔｒｉｅｓ, ｌｉｋｅ Ｈｉｔｌｅｒ¹ｓ Ｇｅｒｍａｎｙ, ｒａｔｈｅｒ ｔｈａｎ ｓｏｍｅｔｈｉｎｇ ｔｈａｔ ｉｓ ｐｒａｃｔｉｃｅｄ ｉｎ ｔｈｅ "ｌａｎｄ ｏｆ ｔｈｅ ｆｒｅｅ" ＵＳＡ. Ｐｅｒｈａｐｓ ｉｔ ｉｓ ｔｈｅ ｔｅｎｄｅｎｃｙ ｔｈａｔ ｗｅ ｈａｖｅ ｏｆ ｂｅｉｎｇ ｂｌｉｎｄ ｔｏ ｗｈａｔ ｉｓ ｄｉｒｅｃｔｌｙ ｉｎ ｆｒｏｎｔ ｏｆ ｕｓ, ｏｒ ｍａｙｂｅ ｉｔ ｉｓ ｂｅｃａｕｓｅ ｗｅ, ａｓ ａ ｐｅｏｐｌｅ, ａｒｅ ｋｅｐｔ ｐｒｅｏｃｃｕｐｉｅｄ ａｎｄ ｂｕｓｙ ｔｈａｔ ｍａｎｙ ｏｆ ｕｓ ｄｏ ｎｏｔ ｒｅａｌｉｚｅ ｔｈａｔ ｗｉｔｈ ｔｈｅ ｐａｓｓｉｎｇ ｏｆ ｔｈｅ Ｐａｔｒｉｏｔ Ａｃｔ ｏｎ Ｏｃｔｏｂｅｒ 26, 2001, ｏｕｒ ｇｏｖｅｒｎｍｅｎｔ ｉｓ ｄｏｉｎｇ ｊｕｓｔ ｔｈａｔ. Ｎｏｗ, ｗｉｔｈ ａ ｂｉｌｌ ｄｕｂｂｅｄ ｔｈｅ Ｐａｔｒｉｏｔ Ａｃｔ ＩＩ, ｍｏｒｅ Ｂｉｇ Ｂｒｏｔｈｅｒ ｍｏｎｉｔｏｒｉｎｇ ａｎｄ ｃｏｎｔｒｏｌ ｍａｙ ｂｅ ｏｎ ｉｔｓ ｗａｙ. Ｔｈｅ Ｐａｔｒｉｏｔ Ａｃｔ ｗａｓ ｈｕｒｒｉｅｄｌｙ ｐａｓｓｅｄ ｉｎ ｔｈｅ ａｆｔｅｒｍａｔｈ ｏｆ 9-11. Ｔｈｅ ｗｏｒｄ "ｐａｔｒｉｏｔ" ｉｎ ｔｈｅ Ｐａｔｒｉｏｔ Ａｃｔ ｉｓ ａｎ ａｃｒｏｎｙｍ ｔｈａｔ ｓｐｅｌｌｓ ｏｕｔ "Ｐｒｏｖｉｄｉｎｇ Ａｐｐｒｏｐｒｉａｔｅ Ｔｏｏｌｓ Ｒｅｑｕｉｒｅｄ ｔｏ Ｉｎｔｅｒｃｅｐｔ ａｎｄ Ｏｂｓｔｒｕｃｔ Ｔｅｒｒｏｒｉｓｍ". Ｗｈｉｌｅ ｔｈｅ ｐｒｅｍｉｓｅ ｏｆ ｔｈｉｓ ａｃｔ ｍａｙ ｓｅｅｍ ｊｕｓｔｉｆｉａｂｌｅ, ｅｓｐｅｃｉａｌｌｙ ｉｍｍｅｄｉａｔｅｌｙ ａｆｔｅｒ ａ ｔｒａｇｅｄｙ ｔｈａｔ ｗａｓ ｃａｔｅｇｏｒｉｚｅｄ ａｓ ａｎ ａｃｔ ｏｆ ｔｅｒｒｏｒｉｓｍ, ｔｈｉｓ ｌｅｇｉｓｌａｔｉｏｎ ｓｌｏｗｌｙ ｃｏｎｓｕｍｅｓ ｍａｎｙ ｃｉｖｉｌ ｌｉｂｅｒｔｉｅｓ ｔｈａｔ ｔｈｉｓ ｃｏｕｎｔｒｙ ｈａｓ ｐｒｉｄｅｄ ｉｔｓｅｌｆ ｏｎ ｓｉｎｃｅ ｉｔｓ ｃｏｎｃｅｐｔｉｏｎ. Ｔｈｉｓ ａｃｔ ｇｉｖｅｓ ｌａｗ ｅｎｆｏｒｃｅｍｅｎｔ ｏｆｆｉｃｉａｌｓ ｂｒｏａｄｅｒ ａｕｔｈｏｒｉｔｙ ｔｏ ｃｏｎｄｕｃｔ ｅｌｅｃｔｒｏｎｉｃ ｓｕｒｖｅｉｌｌａｎｃｅ ａｎｄ ｗｉｒｅｔａｐｓ. Ｉｔ ａｌｓｏ ｇｉｖｅｓ ｔｈｅ ｐｒｅｓｉｄｅｎｔ ｔｈｅ ａｕｔｈｏｒｉｔｙ ｔｏ ｃｏｎｆｉｓｃａｔｅ ａｎｙ ａｎｄ ａｌｌ ｐｒｏｐｅｒｔｙ ｗｉｔｈｉｎ ＵＳ ｊｕｒｉｓｄｉｃｔｉｏｎ ｏｆ ａｎｙｏｎｅ ｗｈｏ ｉｓ ｂｅｌｉｅｖｅｄ ｔｏ ｂｅ ｅｎｇａｇｉｎｇ ｉｎ ｔｅｒｒｏｒｉｓｍ ｗｈｅｎ ｔｈｅ ｃｏｕｎｔｒｙ ｉｓ "ｕｎｄｅｒ ａｔｔａｃｋ". Ｔｈｅ Ａｃｔ ａｌｓｏ ａｆｆｅｃｔｓ ｆｉｎａｎｃｉａｌ ａｃｔｉｖｉｔｉｅｓ ａｎｄ Ｉｍｍｉｇｒａｔｉｏｎ. Ｔｈｅ ｂｉｌｌ ｗａｓ ｐａｓｓｅｄ ｂｙ ａ ｖｏｔｅ ｏｆ 357-66 ｂｙ ｔｈｅ Ｈｏｕｓｅ ｏｆ Ｒｅｐｒｅｓｅｎｔａｔｉｖｅｓ ａｎｄ 98-1 ｂｙ ｔｈｅ Ｓｅｎａｔｅ. "Ｔｏｄａｙ, ｗｅ ｔａｋｅ ａｎ ｅｓｓｅｎｔｉａｌ ｓｔｅｐ ｉｎ ｄｅｆｅａｔｉｎｇ ｔｅｒｒｏｒｉｓｍ ｗｈｉｌｅ ｐｒｏｔｅｃｔｉｎｇ ｔｈｅ ｃｏｎｓｔｉｔｕｔｉｏｎａｌ ｒｉｇｈｔｓ ｏｆ ａｌｌ Ａｍｅｒｉｃａｎｓ," Ｇｅｏｒｇｅ Ｗ. Ｂｕｓｈ ｓａｉｄ ｄｕｒｉｎｇ ｔｈｅ ｓｉｇｎｉｎｇ ｃｅｒｅｍｏｎｙ. Ｗｈｉｌｅ Ｂｕｓｈ¹ｓ ｒｈｅｔｏｒｉｃ ｍａｙ ｈａｖｅ ｂｅｅｎ ｃｏｎｖｉｎｃｉｎｇ ｔｏ ｔｈｅ ｇｅｎｅｒａｌ ｐｕｂｌｉｃ, ｔｈｅ Ａｃｔ, ｉｎ ｒｅａｌｉｔｙ, ｉｎｆｒｉｎｇｅｓ ｏｎ ｏｕｒ Ｃｏｎｓｔｉｔｕｔｉｏｎａｌ Ｒｉｇｈｔｓ. Ｐａｔｒｉｏｔ Ａｃｔ Ｉ "Ｔｈｅｓｅ ｎｅｗ ａｎｄ ｕｎｃｈｅｃｋｅｄ ｐｏｗｅｒｓ ｃｏｕｌｄ ｂｅ ｕｓｅｄ ａｇａｉｎｓｔ Ａｍｅｒｉｃａｎ ｃｉｔｉｚｅｎｓ ｗｈｏ ａｒｅ ｎｏｔ ｕｎｄｅｒ ｃｒｉｍｉｎａｌ ｉｎｖｅｓｔｉｇａｔｉｏｎ, ｉｍｍｉｇｒａｎｔｓ ｗｈｏ ａｒｅ ｈｅｒｅ ｗｉｔｈｉｎ ｏｕｒ ｂｏｒｄｅｒｓ ｌｅｇａｌｌｙ ａｎｄ ａｌｓｏ ａｇａｉｎｓｔ ｔｈｏｓｅ ｗｈｏｓｅ Ｆｉｒｓｔ Ａｍｅｎｄｍｅｎｔ ａｃｔｉｖｉｔｉｅｓ ａｒｅ ｄｅｅｍｅｄ ｔｏ ｂｅ ｔｈｒｅａｔｓ ｔｏ ｎａｔｉｏｎａｌ ｓｅｃｕｒｉｔｙ ｂｙ ｔｈｅ Ａｔｔｏｒｎｅｙ Ｇｅｎｅｒａｌ," Ｇｒｅｇｏｒｙ Ｔ. Ｎｏｊｅｉｍ, Ａｓｓｏｃｉａｔｅ Ｄｉｒｅｃｔｏｒ ｏｆ ｔｈｅ Ａｍｅｒｉｃａｎ Ｃｉｖｉｌ Ｌｉｂｅｒｔｉｅｓ Ｕｎｉｏｎ'ｓ Ｗａｓｈｉｎｇｔｏｎ Ｏｆｆｉｃｅ ｓｔａｔｅｄ. Ｃｒｉｔｉｃｓ ｏｆ ｔｈｅ Ｐａｔｒｉｏｔ Ａｃｔ ｃｏｍｐｌａｉｎ ｔｈａｔ ｉｔ ｆｕｎｎｅｌｓ ｅｘｃｅｓｓｉｖｅ ｐｏｗｅｒ ｔｏ ｔｈｅ Ｅｘｅｃｕｔｉｖｅ ｂｒａｎｃｈ ｏｆ ｔｈｅ ｇｏｖｅｒｎｍｅｎｔ ｗｈｉｌｅ ｌｉｍｉｔｉｎｇ ｔｈｅ Ｃｏｎｇｒｅｓｓ ａｎｄ Ｊｕｄｉｃｉａｌ ｂｒａｎｃｈ, ｔｈｕｓ ｅｌｉｍｉｎａｔｉｎｇ ｓｏｍｅ ｏｆ ｔｈｅ "ｃｈｅｃｋｓ ａｎｄ ｂａｌａｎｃｅｓ" ｔｈａｔ ｗｅｒｅ ｄｅｓｉｇｎｅｄ ｔｏ ｋｅｅｐ ｏｕｒ ｇｏｖｅｒｎｍｅｎｔ ａｃｃｏｕｎｔａｂｌｅ. Ｓｕｒｖｅｉｌｌａｎｃｅ Ｔｈｅ Ｐａｔｒｉｏｔ Ａｃｔ ｐｒｏｖｉｄｅｓ ｆｅｄｅｒａｌ ａｇｅｎｃｉｅｓ ｗｉｔｈ ｍｏｒｅ ｓｕｒｖｅｉｌｌａｎｃｅ ｏｐｔｉｏｎｓ ａｎｄ ｌｅｓｓ ｊｕｄｉｃｉａｌ ｓｕｐｅｒｖｉｓｉｏｎ. "Ｒｏｖｉｎｇ ｗｉｒｅｔａｐｓ" ａｒｅ ｏｎｅ ｅｘａｍｐｌｅ ｏｆ ｔｈｅ ｎｅｗ ｌｅｇａｌｉｚｅｄ ｐｏｗｅｒｓ ｏｆ ｔｈｅ ｇｏｖｅｒｎｍｅｎｔ ｗｉｔｈ ｔｈｅ ｐａｓｓｉｎｇ ｏｆ ｔｈｅ Ｐａｔｒｉｏｔ Ａｃｔ. Ｉｔ ａｌｌｏｗｓ ａ ｒｏｖｉｎｇ ｗｉｒｅｔａｐ ｔｈａｔ ａｌｌｏｗｓ ａ ｐｅｒｓｏｎ'ｓ ｃｏｎｖｅｒｓａｔｉｏｎｓ ｔｏ ｂｅ ｉｎｔｅｒｃｅｐｔｅｄ ｏｎ ｍｕｌｔｉｐｌｅ ｐｈｏｎｅｓ, ｉｎｃｌｕｄｉｎｇ ｃｅｌｌ ｐｈｏｎｅｓ ａｎｄ ｏｔｈｅｒ ｐｈｏｎｅｓ ａ ｔａｒｇｅｔ ｕｓｅｓ (ｐｏｓｓｉｂｌｙ ｉｎ ｓｏｍｅｏｎｅ ｅｌｓｅ'ｓ ｈｏｍｅ). Ｔｈｉｓ ｃａｎ ｎｏｗ ｂｅ ｄｏｎｅ ｗｉｔｈｏｕｔ ｐｒｏｂａｂｌｅ ｃａｕｓｅ. Ｔｈｅｓｅ ｒｏｖｉｎｇ ｗｉｒｅｔａｐｓ ａｒｅ, ｏｆ ｃｏｕｒｓｅ, ａｕｔｈｏｒｉｚｅｄ ｓｅｃｒｅｔｌｙ. Ｂｅｆｏｒｅ ｔｈｅ Ａｃｔ, ｔｈｅ ｇｏｖｅｒｎｍｅｎｔ ｃｏｕｌｄ ｏｒｄｅｒ ａ ｔｅｌｅｐｈｏｎｅ ｃｏｍｐａｎｙ ｔｏ ｔｕｒｎ ｏｖｅｒ ａ ｌｉｓｔ ｏｆ ｔｈｅ ｎｕｍｂｅｒｓ ｂｅｉｎｇ ｄｉａｌｅｄ ｔｏ ａｎｄ ｆｒｏｍ ａ ｐａｒｔｉｃｕｌａｒ ｔｅｌｅｐｈｏｎｅ ｏｎ ａｎ ｏｒｄｅｒ ｆｒｏｍ ａ ｊｕｄｇｅ. Ｔｈｅ Ｐａｔｒｉｏｔ Ａｃｔ ｆｏｒｃｅｓ ａ ｊｕｄｇｅ ｔｏ ｇｒａｎｔ ｔｈｅ ｏｒｄｅｒ ｉｆ ｔｈｅ ｇｏｖｅｒｎｍｅｎｔ ｃｅｒｔｉｆｉｅｓ ｔｈａｔ ｔｈｅ ｉｎｆｏｒｍａｔｉｏｎ ｓｏｕｇｈｔ ｉｓ "ｒｅｌｅｖａｎｔ ｔｏ ｏｎｇｏｉｎｇ ｃｒｉｍｉｎａｌ ｉｎｖｅｓｔｉｇａｔｉｏｎ", ｒｅｇａｒｄｌｅｓｓ ｏｆ ｗｈｅｔｈｅｒ ｏｒ ｎｏｔ ｔｈｅ ｊｕｄｇｅ ａｇｒｅｅｓ. Ｉｔ ａｌｓｏ ａｌｌｏｗｓ ｔｈｅ ｇｏｖｅｒｎｍｅｎｔ ａｃｃｅｓｓ ｔｏ ｄｉａｌｉｎｇ, ｒｏｕｔｉｎｇ ａｎｄ ｓｉｇｎａｌｉｎｇ ｉｎｆｏｒｍａｔｉｏｎ ｉｎ ｃｏｎｎｅｃｔｉｏｎ ｗｉｔｈ ｃｏｍｐｕｔｅｒｓ. Ｔｈｉｓ ｍｅａｎｓ ｔｈａｔ ｔｈｅ ｇｏｖｅｒｎｍｅｎｔ ｌａｗｆｕｌｌｙ ｈａｓ ａｃｃｅｓｓ ｔｏ ｅｍａｉｌｓ ｓｅｎｔ ａｎｄ ｒｅｃｅｉｖｅｄ ａｎｄ ａ ｌｉｓｔ ｏｆ ｗｅｂｓｉｔｅｓ ｖｉｓｉｔｅｄ ｏｎ ａ ｃｏｍｐｕｔｅｒ. Ａｆｔｅｒ ｏｂｔａｉｎｉｎｇ ａ ｗａｒｒａｎｔ, ｆｅｄｓ ｗｉｌｌ ｂｅ ａｂｌｅ ｔｏ ｔｒａｃｋ ａｌｌ ｗｅｂｓｉｔｅｓ ｐｅｏｐｌｅ ｖｉｓｉｔ ｆｒｏｍ ａ ｐｕｂｌｉｃ ｌｉｂｒａｒｙ ａｎｄ ｏｂｔａｉｎ ａｌｌ ｔｈｅ ｅｍａｉｌ ａｄｄｒｅｓｓｅｓ ｉｎｖｏｌｖｅｄ ｉｎ ａｎｙ ｃｏｒｒｅｓｐｏｎｄｅｎｃｅ, ｗｉｔｈｏｕｔ ｔｈｅ ｌｉｂｒａｒｙ ｂｅｉｎｇ ａｂｌｅ ｔｏ ｔｅｌｌ ｉｔｓ ｐａｔｒｏｎｓ ｔｈａｔ ｓｕｒｖｅｉｌｌａｎｃｅ ｉｓ ｔａｋｉｎｇ ｐｌａｃｅ. Ｆｅｄｓ ｗｉｌｌ ａｌｓｏ ｂｅ ｍｏｎｉｔｏｒｉｎｇ ｌｉｂｒａｒｙ ｕｓｅ, ａｎｄ ｉｎｓｔｅａｄ ｏｆ ｂｅｉｎｇ ｒｅｑｕｉｒｅｄ ｔｏ ｓｈｏｗ ｐｒｏｂａｂｌｅ ｃａｕｓｅ ｔｏ ｇｅｔ ａ ｓｅａｒｃｈ ｗａｒｒａｎｔ ｆｏｒ ｌｉｂｒａｒｙ ｒｅｃｏｒｄｓ, ｐａｔｒｏｎ ｒｅｇｉｓｔｒａｔｉｏｎ ｉｎｆｏｒｍａｔｉｏｎ ａｎｄ ｉｎｔｅｒｎｅｔ ｕｓｅ ｒｅｃｏｒｄｓ, ｎｏｗ ａｎ ａｇｅｎｔ ｍｕｓｔ ｏｎｌｙ ｅｘｐｌａｉｎ ｗｈｙ ｈｅ/ｓｈｅ ｔｈｉｎｋｓ ｔｈａｔ ｒｅｃｏｒｄｓ ｍａｙ ｂｅ ｒｅｌａｔｅｄ ｔｏ ｔｅｒｒｏｒｉｓｍ ｏｒ ｉｎｔｅｌｌｉｇｅｎｃｅ ｉｎｖｅｓｔｉｇａｔｉｏｎｓ. Ｕｎｄｅｒ ｔｈｅ Ａｃｔ, ｌｉｂｒａｒｉａｎｓ ｗｉｌｌ ｂｅ ｕｎｄｅｒ ａ ｇａｇ ｏｒｄｅｒ ｐｒｅｖｅｎｔｉｎｇ ｔｈｅｍ ｆｒｏｍ ｔｅｌｌｉｎｇ ｌｉｂｒａｒｙ ｕｓｅｒｓ ｔｈａｔ ｔｈｅｉｒ ｒｅｃｏｒｄｓ ｗｅｒｅ ｔｕｒｎｅｄ ｏｖｅｒ ｔｏ ｔｈｅ ｆｅｄｓ ｆｏｒ ｏｎｇｏｉｎｇ ｍｏｎｉｔｏｒｉｎｇ. Ｉｔ¹ｓ ｎｏｔ ｏｎｌｙ ｌｉｂｒａｒｉｅｓ ｔｈａｔ ａｒｅ ａｆｆｅｃｔｅｄ - ｂｏｏｋｓｔｏｒｅｓ ａｒｅ ｕｎｄｅｒ ｔｈｅ ｓａｍｅ ｍｉｃｒｏｓｃｏｐｅ. Ｗａｒｒａｎｔｓ ｃａｎ ｂｅ ｏｂｔａｉｎｅｄ ｑｕｉｔｅ ｅａｓｉｌｙ ｔｈａｔ ａｌｌｏｗ ａｇｅｎｔｓ ｔｏ ｃｏｌｌｅｃｔ "ａｎｙ ｔａｎｇｉｂｌｅ ｔｈｉｎｇｓ" ｉｎ ａ ｂｏｏｋｓｔｏｒｅ (ｏｒ ｌｉｂｒａｒｙ). Ｔｈｉｓ ｗｏｕｌｄ ｉｎｃｌｕｄｅ ｃｕｓｔｏｍｅｒ ｒｅｃｏｒｄｓ ａｎｄ ｐｅｒｓｏｎａｌ ｉｎｆｏｒｍａｔｉｏｎ, ｂｏｏｋ ｃｉｒｃｕｌａｔｉｏｎ ｒｅｃｏｒｄｓ, ｄｉｓｋｓ ａｎｄ ｃｏｍｐｕｔｅｒｓ. "Ｗｅ ｎｏｗ ｋｎｏｗ ｔｈａｔ ｂｏｏｋｓｔｏｒｅｓ ａｎｄ ｌｉｂｒａｒｉｅｓ ｈａｖｅ ｒｅｃｅｉｖｅｄ ｓｕｃｈ ｓｕｂｐｏｅｎａｓ ａｓｋｉｎｇ ｆｏｒ ｔｈｅ ｐｕｒｃｈａｓｅ ｏｒ ｌｅｎｄｉｎｇ ｒｅｃｏｒｄｓ ｏｆ ｔｈｅｉｒ ｐａｔｒｏｎｓ. Ｉｔ ｉｓ ａ ｔｒｕｌｙ ｆｒｉｇｈｔｅｎｉｎｇ ｄａｙ ｉｎ Ａｍｅｒｉｃａ ｗｈｅｎ ｂｏｏｋｓｔｏｒｅｓ ａｒｅ ｃｏｎｓｉｄｅｒｉｎｇ ｄｅｓｔｒｏｙｉｎｇ ｔｈｅｉｒ ｒｅｃｏｒｄｓ ｓｏ ｗｈｅｎ ｔｈｅ ｇｏｖｅｒｎｍｅｎｔ ｃｏｍｅｓ ｋｎｏｃｋｉｎｇ ａｔ ｔｈｅ ｄｏｏｒ ｔｏ ｆｉｎｄ ｏｕｔ ｗｈａｔ ｔｈｅｉｒ ｃｕｓｔｏｍｅｒｓ ｈａｖｅ ｂｅｅｎ ｒｅａｄｉｎｇ ｔｈｅｙ ｗｉｌｌ ｈａｖｅ ｎｏｔｈｉｎｇ ｔｏ ｔｕｒｎ ｏｖｅｒ," Ｓｅｎａｔｏｒ Ｒｕｓｓ Ｆｅｉｎｇｏｌｄ (Ｄｅｍｏｃｒａｔ, Ｗｉｓｃｏｎｓｉｎ) ｓａｉｄ. Ｉｍｍｉｇｒａｔｉｏｎ Ｔｈｅ Ｐａｔｒｉｏｔ Ａｃｔ ｅｎａｂｌｅｓ ｔｈｅ Ａｔｔｏｒｎｅｙ Ｇｅｎｅｒａｌ ｔｏ ｃｅｒｔｉｆｙ ｔｈａｔ ｈｅ ｈａｓ "ｒｅａｓｏｎａｂｌｅ ｇｒｏｕｎｄｓ ｔｏ ｂｅｌｉｅｖｅ" ｔｈａｔ ａ ｎｏｎ-ｃｉｔｉｚｅｎ ｅｎｄａｎｇｅｒｓ ｎａｔｉｏｎａｌ ｓｅｃｕｒｉｔｙ. Ｈｅ ｃａｎ ｄｅｔａｉｎ ａｎｄ ｄｅｐｏｒｔ ｎｏｎ-ｃｉｔｉｚｅｎｓ ｗｉｔｈ ｌｉｔｔｌｅ ｏｒ ｎｏ ｊｕｄｉｃｉａｌ ｒｅｖｉｅｗ. Ｔｈｅ Ａｔｔｏｒｎｅｙ Ｇｅｎｅｒａｌ ａｎｄ ｔｈｅ Ｓｅｃｒｅｔａｒｙ ｏｆ Ｓｔａｔｅ ｎｏｗ ｈａｖｅ ｔｈｅ ａｕｔｈｏｒｉｔｙ ｔｏ ｄｅｓｉｇｎａｔｅ ｄｏｍｅｓｔｉｃ ｇｒｏｕｐｓ ａｓ ｔｅｒｒｏｒｉｓｔ ｏｒｇａｎｉｚａｔｉｏｎｓ, ａｎｄ ｃａｎ ｄｅｐｏｒｔ ａｎｙ ｎｏｎ-ｃｉｔｉｚｅｎ ｗｈｏ ｉｓ ａ ｐａｒｔ ｏｆ ｔｈｅｍ. "Ｉｆ ｙｏｕ ｏｖｅｒｓｔａｙ ｙｏｕｒ ｖｉｓａｓ ｅｖｅｎ ｂｙ ｏｎｅ ｄａｙ, ｗｅ ｗｉｌｌ ａｒｒｅｓｔ ｙｏｕ. Ｉｆ ｙｏｕ ｖｉｏｌａｔｅ ａ ｌｏｃａｌ ｌａｗ - ｗｅ ｗｉｌｌ ｈｏｐｅ ｔｈａｔ ｙｏｕ ｗｉｌｌ, ａｎｄ ｗｏｒｋ ｔｏ ｍａｋｅ ｓｕｒｅ ｔｈａｔ ｙｏｕ ａｒｅ ｐｕｔ ｉｎ ｊａｉｌ ａｎｄ ｂｅ ｋｅｐｔ ｉｎ ｃｕｓｔｏｄｙ ａｓ ｌｏｎｇ ａｓ ｐｏｓｓｉｂｌｅ," Ｊｏｈｎ Ａｓｈｃｒｏｆｔ ｖｏｗｅｄ ｔｏ "ｓｕｓｐｅｃｔｅｄ ｔｅｒｒｏｒｉｓｔｓ". Ｏｔｈｅｒ Ｐｏｗｅｒｓ Ｔｈｅ Ａｔｔｏｒｎｅｙ Ｇｅｎｅｒａｌ ａｎｎｏｕｎｃｅｄ ｔｈａｔ ｈｅ ｉｎｔｅｎｄｓ ｔｏ ｅａｖｅｓｄｒｏｐ ｏｎ ｉｎｍａｔｅｓ¹ ａｔｔｏｒｎｅｙ-ｃｌｉｅｎｔ ｃｏｎｖｅｒｓａｔｉｏｎｓ. "Ｉ¹ｖｅ ｈｅａｒｄ ｄｉｓｃｕｓｓｉｏｎ ｏｆ ｉｔ ｏｎ ｓｏｍｅ ｏｆ ｔｈｅ ｔａｌｋ ｓｈｏｗｓ ｉｎ ｏｕｒ ｓｔａｔｅ..." Ｍａｒｉａ Ｃａｎｗｅｌｌ (Ｗａｓｈｉｎｇｔｏｎ Ｓｅｎａｔｏｒ) ｓａｉｄ. "Ａｔｔｏｒｎｅｙｓ [ｗｅｒｅ] ｃａｌｌｉｎｇ ｉｎ ａｎｄ ｓａｙｉｎｇ ｔｈａｔ ｉｎｆｏｒｍａｔｉｏｎ, ｔｈｅｉｒ ｐｒｉｖａｔｅ ｃｏｎｖｅｒｓａｔｉｏｎｓ ｂｅｔｗｅｅｎ ｔｈｅｍ ａｎｄ ｔｈｅｉｒ ｃｌｉｅｎｔ, ｗｅｒｅ ｂｅｉｎｇ ｇａｔｈｅｒｅｄ." Ｔｈｅ Ａｔｔｏｒｎｅｙ Ｇｅｎｅｒａｌ ｈａｓ ｓａｉｄ ｔｈａｔ ｈｅ ｉｎｔｅｎｄｓ ｔｏ ｈａｖｅ ｓｔａｔｅ ａｎｄ ｌｏｃａｌ ｌａｗ ｅｎｆｏｒｃｅｍｅｎｔ ｈｅｌｐ ｑｕｅｓｔｉｏｎ 5000 ｐｅｏｐｌｅ ｗｈｏ ａｐｐｅａｒ ｔｏ ｈａｖｅ ｂｅｅｎ ｓｅｌｅｃｔｅｄ ｂａｓｅｄ ｏｎ ｅｔｈｎｉｃｉｔｙ ｏｒ ｒｅｌｉｇｉｏｎ. Ｔｈｅ Ｐｒｅｓｉｄｅｎｔ ｉｓｓｕｅｄ ａｎ Ｅｘｅｃｕｔｉｖｅ ｏｒｄｅｒ ｄｅｃｌａｒｉｎｇ ｔｈａｔ ｈｅ ｗｉｌｌ ｄｅｃｉｄｅ ｗｈｅｎ ｔｒｉａｌｓ ｗｉｌｌ ｔａｋｅ ｐｌａｃｅ ｂｅｆｏｒｅ ｍｉｌｉｔａｒｙ ｃｏｍｍｉｓｓｉｏｎｓ ｒａｔｈｅｒ ｔｈａｎ ｉｎ ｎｏｒｍａｌ ｃｏｕｒｔｓ. Ｆｒｅｅｄｏｍ ｏｆ ｔｈｅ ｐｒｅｓｓ ｍｅａｎｓ ｖｅｒｙ ｌｉｔｔｌｅ ｉｆ ｏｎｅ ｃａｎｎｏｔ ｒｅａｄ ｂｏｏｋｓ ｆｒｅｅｌｙ. Ｏｕｒ ｆｒｅｅｄｏｍ ｔｏ ｇａｔｈｅｒ ｍｅａｎｓ ｖｉｒｔｕａｌｌｙ ｎｏｔｈｉｎｇ ｉｆ ａ ｇｒｏｕｐ ｏｒ ｏｒｇａｎｉｚａｔｉｏｎ ｃａｎ ｂｅ ｄｅｅｍｅｄ ａ ｔｅｒｒｏｒｉｓｔ ｇｒｏｕｐ ａｔ ｔｈｅ ｓｏｌｅ ｄｉｓｃｒｅｔｉｏｎ ｏｆ ｔｈｅ Ａｔｔｏｒｎｅｙ Ｇｅｎｅｒａｌ ｏｒ Ｓｅｃｒｅｔａｒｙ ｏｆ Ｓｔａｔｅ. Ｄｕｅ ｐｒｏｃｅｓｓ ｏｆ ｌａｗ ｉｓ ｅｘｔｉｎｃｔ ｉｆ ｔｈｅ ｇｏｖｅｒｎｍｅｎｔ ｉｓ ａｌｌｏｗｅｄ ｔｏ ｄｅｔａｉｎ ｐｅｏｐｌｅ ｂａｓｅｄ ｎｏｔ ｏｎ ｅｖｉｄｅｎｃｅ, ｂｕｔ ｏｎ ｔｈｅｉｒ "ｂｅｌｉｅｆ" ｔｈａｔ ｔｈｅｙ ａｒｅ ｉｎｖｏｌｖｅｄ ｉｎ"ｔｅｒｒｏｒｉｓｔ" ａｃｔｉｖｉｔｙ, ｋｅｅｐ ｔｈｅｍ ｉｎ ｓｅｃｒｅｔ ｌｏｃａｔｉｏｎｓ, ａｎｄ ｒｅｆｕｓｅ ｔｏ ｓｈａｒｅ ｔｈｅｉｒ ｌｏｃａｔｉｏｎｓ, ｃｏｎｄｉｔｉｏｎｓ, ｓｔａｔｅ ｏｆ ｗｅｌｌ-ｂｅｉｎｇ ｏｒ ｒｅａｓｏｎｓ ｆｏｒ ｄｅｔａｉｎｉｎｇ ｔｈｅｍ. Ｓｏｍｅ ｍｅｍｂｅｒｓ ｏｆ Ｃｏｎｇｒｅｓｓ ｈａｖｅ ｂｅｃｏｍｅ ｗｏｒｒｉｅｄ. Ｔｈｏｓｅ ｗｈｏ ａｒｅ ｃｏｎｓｃｉｏｕｓ ｅｎｏｕｇｈ ｈａｖｅ ａｓｋｅｄ ｔｈｅ Ｊｕｓｔｉｃｅ Ｄｅｐａｒｔｍｅｎｔ ｔｏ ｓｈｏｗ ｈｏｗ ｉｔ ｉｓ ｕｓｉｎｇ ｉｔｓ ｎｅｗ ｐｏｗｅｒｓ. Ｔｈｅｙ ｈａｖｅ ｒｅｃｅｉｖｅｄ ｌｉｔｔｌｅ ｔｏ ｎｏ ｉｎｆｏｒｍａｔｉｏｎ, ｈｏｗｅｖｅｒ. Ｉｎ ｆａｃｔ, ｍｏｓｔ ｏｆ ｔｈｅ ｉｎｆｏｒｍａｔｉｏｎ ｒｅｇａｒｄｉｎｇ ｌｉｂｒａｒｉｅｓ ａｎｄ ｂｏｏｋｓｔｏｒｅｓ ｈａｖｅ ｂｅｅｎ ｃｌａｓｓｉｆｉｅｄ ａｓ ³ｃｏｎｆｉｄｅｎｔｉａｌ² ａｎｄ ｈａｓ ｎｏｔ ｂｅｅｎ ｒｅｌｅａｓｅｄ ｔｏ Ｃｏｎｇｒｅｓｓ. Ｎａｔｉｏｎａｌ ｏｒｇａｎｉｚａｔｉｏｎｓ ｆｉｌｉｎｇ ａ ｒｅｑｕｅｓｔ ｕｎｄｅｒ ｔｈｅ Ｆｒｅｅｄｏｍ ｏｆ Ｉｎｆｏｒｍａｔｉｏｎ Ａｃｔ ｈａｖｅ ｎｏｔ ｂｅｅｎ ａｂｌｅ ｔｏ ｏｂｔａｉｎ ｉｎｆｏｒｍａｔｉｏｎ ｒｅｇａｒｄｉｎｇ ｈｏｗ ｍａｎｙ ｔｉｍｅｓ ｔｈｅ ｇｏｖｅｒｎｍｅｎｔ ｈａｓ ｕｓｅｄ ｉｔｓ ｎｅｗ ｗｉｒｅｔａｐ ａｕｔｈｏｒｉｔｉｅｓ. Ｍｅａｎｗｈｉｌｅ, ａｎ ｉｎｆｏｒｍａｌ ｓｕｒｖｅｙ ｄｏｎｅ ｂｙ ｔｈｅ Ｕｎｉｖｅｒｓｉｔｙ ｏｆ Ｉｌｌｉｎｏｉｓ ｆｏｕｎｄ ｔｈａｔ 83 ｌｉｂｒａｒｉｅｓ ａｃｒｏｓｓ ｔｈｅ ｃｏｕｎｔｒｙ ｈａｖｅ ｂｅｅｎ ｖｉｓｉｔｅｄ ｂｙ ａｕｔｈｏｒｉｔｉｅｓ ｓｉｎｃｅ ｔｈｅ Ｓｅｐｔ. 11 ｉｎｃｉｄｅｎｔ. Ｕｎｄｅｒ ｔｈｅ Ｐａｔｒｉｏｔ Ａｃｔ, ｔｈｅ ｇｏｖｅｒｎｍｅｎｔ ｈａｓ ｔｈｅ ｌｅｇａｌ ａｕｔｈｏｒｉｔｙ ｔｏ ｗａｔｃｈ ａｎｄ ｍｏｎｉｔｏｒ ａｎｙｏｎｅ¹ｓ ａｃｔｉｖｉｔｉｅｓ, ｐｈｏｎｅ ｃｏｎｖｅｒｓａｔｉｏｎｓ, ｉｎｔｅｒｎｅｔ ｕｓａｇｅ ａｎｄ ｒｅａｄｉｎｇ ｈａｂｉｔｓ. Ｔｈｅｙ ｃａｎ ｒｅａｄ ｙｏｕｒ ｅｍａｉｌ. Ａｎｄ ｔｈｅｙ ｃａｎ ｔａｋｅ ａｃｔｉｏｎ ｗｉｔｈｏｕｔ ｗａｒｎｉｎｇ, ｌｅｇａｌｌｙ ａｎｄ ｓｅｃｒｅｔｌｙ. Ｐａｔｒｉｏｔ Ａｃｔ ＩＩ Ａｓ ｉｆ ｔｈｅ ｏｒｉｇｉｎａｌ Ｐａｔｒｉｏｔ Ａｃｔ ｗａｓｎ'ｔ ａｄｅｑｕａｔｅ ｔｏ ｄｉｓｃｏｕｒａｇｅ ｔｈｅ ｐｕｂｌｉｃ ｆｒｏｍ ｆｒｅｅｌｙ ｖｏｉｃｉｎｇ ｔｈｅｉｒ ｏｐｉｎｉｏｎｓ, ｒｅａｄｉｎｇ ｗｈａｔ ｔｈｅｙ ｗｉｓｈ, ａｎｄ ｆｅｅｌｉｎｇ ｆｒｅｅ ｉｎ ｔｈｅ ｃｏｕｎｔｒｙ ｔｈａｔ ｓｅｅｓ ｉｔｓｅｌｆ ａｓ ｔｈｅ ｄｅｆｅｎｄｅｒ ｏｆ ｆｒｅｅｄｏｍ ａｎｄ ｄｅｍｏｃｒａｃｙ, ａ ｎｅｗ ｂｉｌｌ ｄｕｂｂｅｄ ｔｈｅ Ｐａｔｒｉｏｔ Ａｃｔ ＩＩ ｔｈａｔ ｉｓ ｓｅｃｒｅｔｌｙ ｉｎ ｔｈｅ ｗｏｒｋｓ ｗｉｌｌ ｒｅｄｕｃｅ ｏｕｒ ｐｒｉｖａｃｙ ｅｖｅｎ ｍｏｒｅ. Ｔｈｅ Ｃｅｎｔｅｒ ｆｏｒ ＰＵｂｌｉｃ Ｉｎｔｅｇｒｉｔｙ ｏｂｔａｉｎｅｄ ａ ｄｒａｆｔ ｏｆ ｔｈｅ ｎｅｗ ｌｅｇｉｓｌａｔｉｏｎ ｔｈａｔ ｗａｓ ｄａｔｅｄ Ｊａｎｕａｒｙ 9, 2003, ａｎｄ ｈａｓ ｐｕｂｌｉｓｈｅｄ ｉｔ ｏｎ ｔｈｅ ｉｎｔｅｒｎｅｔ. Ｔｈｉｓ ｕｎｒｅｌｅａｓｅｄ ｄｒａｆｔ ｐｒｏｖｅｓ ｔｈａｔ, ａｌｔｈｏｕｇｈ ｔｈｅｙ ｈａｖｅ ｄｅｎｉｅｄ ｓｕｃｈ ａ ｂｉｌｌ, ｔｈｅ ｇｏｖｅｒｎｍｅｎｔ ｉｓ ｐｌａｎｎｉｎｇ ａ ｎｅｗ ｌｅｇｉｓｌａｔｉｏｎ ｔｈａｔ ｆｕｒｔｈｅｒ ｅｍｐｏｗｅｒｓ ｔｈｅ ｇｏｖｅｒｎｍｅｎｔ. Ａｆｔｅｒ ｔｈｅ Ｃｅｎｔｅｒ ｐｕｂｌｉｓｈｅｄ ｔｈｅ ｓｔｏｒｙ ａｎｄ ｔｈｅ ｄｒａｆｔ ｏｆ ｔｈｅ ｂｉｌｌ, ｔｈｅ ｇｏｖｅｒｎｍｅｎｔ, ｗｈｏ ｈａｄ ｐｒｅｖｉｏｕｓｌｙ ｄｅｎｉｅｄ ａｎｙ ｋｎｏｗｌｅｄｇｅ ｏｆ ｓｕｃｈ ａ ｐｒｏｐｏｓａｌ, ｃｈａｎｇｅｄ ｉｔｓ ｓｔｏｒｙ. Ｂａｒｂａｒａ Ｃｒｏｍｓｔｏｃｋ, ｔｈｅ ｄｉｒｅｃｔｏｒ ｏｆ ｐｕｂｌｉｃ ａｆｆａｉｒｓ ｆｏｒ ｔｈｅ Ｊｕｓｔｉｃｅ Ｄｅｐａｒｔｍｅｎｔ, ｒｅｌｅａｓｅｄ ａ ｓｔａｔｅｍｅｎｔ ｓａｙｉｎｇ, "Ｄｅｐａｒｔｍｅｎｔ ｓｔａｆｆ ｈａｖｅ ｎｏｔ ｐｒｅｓｅｎｔｅｄ ａｎｙ ｆｉｎａｌ ｐｒｏｐｏｓａｌｓ ｔｏ ｅｉｔｈｅｒ ｔｈｅ Ａｔｔｏｒｎｅｙ Ｇｅｎｅｒａｌ ｏｒ ｔｈｅ Ｗｈｉｔｅ Ｈｏｕｓｅ. Ｉｔ ｗｏｕｌｄ ｂｅ ｐｒｅｍａｔｕｒｅ ｔｏ ｓｐｅｃｕｌａｔｅ ｏｎ ａｎｙ ｆｕｔｕｒｅ ｄｅｃｉｓｉｏｎｓ, ｐａｒｔｉｃｕｌａｒｌｙ ｉｄｅａｓ ｏｒ ｐｒｏｐｏｓａｌｓ ｔｈａｔ ａｒｅ ｓｔｉｌｌ ｂｅｉｎｇ ｄｉｓｃｕｓｓｅｄ ａｔ ｓｔａｆｆ ｌｅｖｅｌｓ." Ｍｅａｎｗｈｉｌｅ, ｔｈｅ ＰＢＳ ｐｒｏｇｒａｍ ³"Ｎｏｗ ｗｉｔｈ Ｂｉｌｌ Ｂｏｙｅｒｓ" ｏｂｔａｉｎｅｄ ａｎ Ｏｆｆｉｃｅ ｏｆ Ｌｅｇｉｓｌａｔｉｖｅ Ａｆｆａｉｒｓ ｃｏｎｔｒｏｌ ｓｈｅｅｔ ｉｎｄｉｃａｔｉｎｇ ｔｈａｔ ａ ｃｏｐｙ ｏｆ ｔｈｅ ｂｉｌｌ ｗａｓ ｓｅｎｔ ｔｏ Ｓｐｅａｋｅｒ ｏｆ ｔｈｅ Ｈｏｕｓｅ Ｄｅｎｎｉｓ Ｈａｓｔｅｒｔ ａｎｄ Ｖｉｃｅ Ｐｒｅｓｉｄｅｎｔ Ｒｉｃｈａｒｄ Ｃｈｅｎｅｙ ｏｎ Ｊａｎｕａｒｙ 10, 2003. "Ａｔｔａｃｈｅｄ ｆｏｒ ｙｏｕｒ ｒｅｖｉｅｗ ａｎｄ ｃｏｍｍｅｎｔ ｉｓ ａ ｄｒａｆｔ ｌｅｇｉｓｌａｔｉｖｅ ｐｒｏｐｏｓａｌ ｅｎｔｉｔｌｅｄ ｔｈｅ ŒＤｏｍｅｓｔｉｃ Ｓｅｃｕｒｉｔｙ Ｅｎｈａｎｃｅｍｅｎｔ Ａｃｔ ｏｆ 2003¹." ｔｈｅ ｍｅｍｏ ｓａｉｄ ｔｈａｔ ｗａｓ ｓｅｎｔ ｆｒｏｍ ｔｈｅ Ｏｆｆｉｃｅ ｏｆ Ｌｅｇａｌ Ｐｏｌｉｃｙ. Ｐｅｒｈａｐｓ ｉｔ ｉｓ ｂｅｃａｕｓｅ ｏｆ ｔｈｅ ｓｅｖｅｒｉｔｙ ｏｆ ｔｈｉｓ ｂｉｌｌ¹ｓ ｐｒｏｖｉｓｉｏｎｓ ｔｈａｔ ｉｔ ｉｓ ｓｕｒｒｏｕｎｄｅｄ ｂｙ ｌｉｅｓ ａｎｄ ｄｉｓｈｏｎｅｓｔｙ. Ｓｅｃｔｉｏｎ 201 ｏｆ Ｐａｔｒｉｏｔ Ａｃｔ ＩＩ, Ｐｒｏｈｉｂｉｔｉｏｎ ｏｆ Ｄｉｓｃｌｏｓｕｒｅ ｏｆ Ｔｅｒｒｏｒｉｓｍ Ｉｎｖｅｓｔｉｇａｔｉｏｎ Ｄｅｔａｉｎｅｅ Ｉｎｆｏｒｍａｔｉｏｎ, ｅｎｈａｎｃｅｓ ｔｈｅ Ｆｒｅｅｄｏｍ ｏｆ Ｉｎｆｏｒｍａｔｉｏｎ Ｉｎｆｏｒｍａｔｉｏｎ Ａｃｔ ｏｆｆｉｃｅｒｓ ａｂｉｌｉｔｙ ｔｏ ｄｅｎｙ ｒｅｌｅａｓｉｎｇ ｍａｔｅｒｉａｌ ｏｎ ｓｕｓｐｅｃｔｅｄ ｔｅｒｒｏｒｉｓｔｓ ｉｎ ｇｏｖｅｒｎｍｅｎｔ ｃｕｓｔｏｄｙ. Ｉｎ ｏｔｈｅｒ ｗｏｒｄｓ, ｉｆ ｔｈｅ ｇｏｖｅｒｎｍｅｎｔ ｄｅｔａｉｎｓ ｓｏｍｅｏｎｅ ｆｏｒ ｓｕｓｐｅｃｔｅｄ ｔｅｒｒｏｒｉｓｍ, ｔｈｅｙ ｄｏ ｎｏｔ ｈａｖｅ ｔｏ ｒｅｌｅａｓｅ ａｎｙ ｉｎｆｏｒｍａｔｉｏｎ ｏｎ ｔｈａｔ ｐｅｒｓｏｎ. Ｓｅｃｔｉｏｎ 202, Ｄｉｓｔｒｉｂｕｔｉｏｎ ｏｆ ŒＷｏｒｓｔ Ｃａｓｅ Ｓｃｅｎａｒｉｏ¹ Ｉｎｆｏｒｍａｔｉｏｎ, ｒｅｓｔｒｉｃｔｓ ｔｈｅ ｐｕｂｌｉｃ¹ｓ ｉｎｆｏｒｍａｔｉｏｎ ｔｏ ｐｒｉｖａｔｅ ｃｏｍｐａｎｙ¹ｓ "ｗｏｒｓｔ ｃａｓｅ ｓｃｅｎａｒｉｏ" ｍａｎｄａｔｏｒｙ ｒｅｐｏｒｔｓ. Ｃｏｍｐａｎｉｅｓ ｕｓｉｎｇ ｐｏｔｅｎｔｉａｌｌｙ ｄａｎｇｅｒｏｕｓ ｃｈｅｍｉｃａｌｓ ｍｕｓｔ ｐｒｏｄｕｃｅ ｔｈｅｓｅ ｒｅｐｏｒｔｓ, ｗｈｉｃｈ ｉｎｃｌｕｄｅ ｔｈｅ ｅｆｆｅｃｔ ｔｈａｔ ｔｈｅ ｒｅｌｅａｓｅ ｏｆ ｔｈｅ ｃｏｎｔｒｏｌｌｅｄ ｓｕｂｓｔａｎｃｅｓ ｗｏｕｌｄ ｈａｖｅ ｏｎ ｔｈｅ ｓｕｒｒｏｕｎｄｉｎｇ ｃｏｍｍｕｎｉｔｙ. Ｉｆ ｔｈｅｓｅ ｒｅｐｏｒｔｓ ａｒｅ ｋｅｐｔ ｃｏｎｆｉｄｅｎｔｉａｌ, ｏｕｒ ｃｏｍｍｕｎｉｔｉｅｓ ｍａｙ ｂｅ ｉｎｆｉｌｔｒａｔｅｄ ｗｉｔｈ ｍｏｒｅ ｃｏｍｐａｎｉｅｓ ｕｓｉｎｇ ｄａｎｇｅｒｏｕｓ ｃｈｅｍｉｃａｌｓ ｗｉｔｈｏｕｔ ｏｕｒ ｋｎｏｗｌｅｄｇｅ, ａｎｄ ｏｕｒ ｈｅａｌｔｈ ｍａｙ ｂｅ ｐｕｔ ａｔ ｒｉｓｋ. Ｓｅｃｔｉｏｎ 301-306,Ｔｅｒｒｏｒｉｓｔ Ｉｄｅｎｔｉｆｉｃａｔｉｏｎ Ｄａｔａｂａｓｅ, ａｕｔｈｏｒｉｚｅ ａ ＤＮＡ ｄａｔａｂａｓｅ ｔｏ ｂｅ ｃｒｅａｔｅｄ ｏｎ "ｓｕｓｐｅｃｔｅｄ ｔｅｒｒｏｒｉｓｔｓ". Ｔｈｅ ｄｅｆｉｎｉｔｉｏｎ ｏｆ ａ ｓｕｓｐｅｃｔｅｄ ｔｅｒｒｏｒｉｓｔ ｉｓ ｅｘｐａｎｄｅｄ ｔｏ ｉｎｃｌｕｄｅ ａｓｓｏｃｉａｔｉｏｎ ｗｉｔｈ ｓｕｓｐｅｃｔｅｄ ｔｅｒｒｏｒｉｓｔ ｇｒｏｕｐｓ ａｎｄ ｎｏｎｃｉｔｉｚｅｎｓ ｓｕｓｐｅｃｔｅｄ ｏｆ ｃｅｒｔａｉｎ ｃｒｉｍｅｓ. Ｓｅｃｔｉｏｎ 312. Ａｐｐｒｏｐｒｉａｔｅ Ｒｅｍｅｄｉｅｓ ｗｉｔｈ Ｒｅｓｐｅｃｔ ｔｏ Ｌａｗ Ｅｎｆｏｒｃｅｍｅｎｔ Ｓｕｒｖｅｉｌｌａｎｃｅ Ａｃｔｉｖｉｔｉｅｓ, ｔｅｒｍｉｎａｔｅｓ ｓｔａｔｅ ｌａｗ ｅｎｆｏｒｃｅｍｅｎｔ ｃｏｎｓｅｎｔ ｄｅｃｒｅｅｓ ｂｅｆｏｒｅ Ｓｅｐｔｅｍｂｅｒ 11, 2001 ｔｈａｔ ｌｉｍｉｔ ａｇｅｎｃｉｅｓ ｆｒｏｍ ｇａｔｈｅｒｉｎｇ ｉｎｆｏｒｍａｔｉｏｎ ａｂｏｕｔ ｉｎｄｉｖｉｄｕａｌｓ ｏｒ ｏｒｇａｎｉｚａｔｉｏｎｓ. Ｉｔ ａｌｓｏ ｐｌａｃｅｓ ｒｅｓｔｒｉｃｔｉｏｎ ｏｎ ｃｏｕｒｔ ｉｎｊｕｎｃｔｉｏｎｓ. Ｓｅｃｔｉｏｎ 405 , Ｐｒｅｓｕｍｐｔｉｏｎ ｆｏｒ Ｐｒｅｔｒｉａｌ Ｄｅｔｅｎｔｉｏｎ ｉｎ Ｃａｓｅｓ Ｉｎｖｏｌｖｉｎｇ Ｔｅｒｒｏｒｉｓｍ, ａｌｌｏｗｓ ｔｈｏｓｅ ｓｕｓｐｅｃｔｅｄ ｏｆ ｔｅｒｒｏｒｉｓｍ ｔｏ ｂｅ ｈｅｌｄ ｂｅｆｏｒｅ ｔｈｅｉｒ ｔｒｉａｌ. Ｓｅｃｔｉｏｎ 501 Ｅｘｐａｔｒｉａｔｉｏｎ ｏｆ Ｔｅｒｒｏｒｉｓｔｓ ａｌｌｏｗｓ ａｎ Ａｍｅｒｉｃａｎ ｃｉｔｉｚｅｎ ｔｏ ｂｅ ｅｘｐａｔｒｉａｔｅｄ ｉｆ ｈｉｓ ｉｎｔｅｎｔ ｔｏ ｒｅｌｉｎｑｕｉｓｈ ｃｉｔｉｚｅｎｓｈｉｐ ｉｓ "ｉｎｆｅｒｒｅｄ ｆｒｏｍ ｃｏｎｄｕｃｔ". Ｔｈｉｓ ｗｏｕｌｄ ａｌｌｏｗ ｃｉｔｉｚｅｎｓ ｔｏ ｂｅ ｅｘｐａｔｒｉａｔｅｄ ｆｏｒ ｅｎｇａｇｉｎｇ ｉｎ ｌａｗｆｕｌ ａｃｔｉｖｉｔｉｅｓ ｏｆ ａ ｇｒｏｕｐ ｄｅｓｉｇｎａｔｅｄ ａｓ ａ ｔｅｒｒｏｒｉｓｔ ｏｒｇａｎｉｚａｔｉｏｎ ｂｙ ｔｈｅ Ａｔｔｏｒｎｅｙ Ｇｅｎｅｒａｌ. Ｄｒ. Ｄａｖｉｄ Ｃｏｌｅ, Ｇｅｏｒｇｅｔｏｗｎ Ｕｎｉｖｅｒｓｉｔｙ Ｌａｗ ｐｒｏｆｅｓｓｏｒ, ｒｅｖｉｅｗｅｄ ｔｈｅ ｄｒａｆｔ ｌｅｇｉｓｌａｔｉｏｎ ａｎｄ ｓａｉｄ ｔｈａｔ ｉｔ "ｒａｉｓｅｓ ａ ｌｏｔ ｏｆ ｓｅｒｉｏｕｓ ｃｏｎｃｅｒｎｓ" ｂｅｃａｕｓｅ ｔｈｅ ｐｒｏｐｏｓｅｄ ｌａｗ ｗｏｕｌｄ "ｒａｄｉｃａｌｌｙ ｅｘｐａｎｄ ｌａｗ ｅｎｆｏｒｃｅｍｅｎｔ ａｎｄ ｉｎｔｅｌｌｉｇｅｎｃｅ ｇａｔｈｅｒｉｎｇ ａｕｔｈｏｒｉｔｉｅｓ, ｒｅｄｕｃｅ ｏｒ ｅｌｉｍｉｎａｔｅ ｊｕｄｉｃｉａｌ ｏｖｅｒｓｉｇｈｔ ｏｖｅｒ ｓｕｒｖｅｉｌｌａｎｃｅ, ａｕｔｈｏｒｉｚｅ ｓｅｃｒｅｔ ａｒｒｅｓｔｓ, ｃｒｅａｔｅ ａ ＤＮＡ ｄａｔａｂａｓｅ ｂａｓｅｄ ｏｎ ｕｎｃｈｅｃｋｅｄ ｅｘｅｃｕｔｉｖｅ Œｓｕｓｐｉｃｉｏｎ¹, ｃｒｅａｔｅ ｎｅｗ ｄｅａｔｈ ｐｅｎａｌｔｉｅｓ, ａｎｄ ｅｖｅｎ ｓｅｅｋ ｔｏ ｔａｋｅ Ａｍｅｒｉｃａｎ ｃｉｔｉｚｅｎｓｈｉｐ ａｗａｙ ｆｒｏｍ ｐｅｒｓｏｎｓ ｗｈｏ ｂｅｌｏｎｇｅｄ ｔｏ ｄｉｓｆａｖｏｒｅｄ ｐｏｌｉｔｉｃａｌ ｇｒｏｕｐｓ." Ｐａｔｒｉｏｔ Ａｃｔ ＩＩ ａｌｌｏｗｓ ｔｈｅ ｇｏｖｅｒｎｍｅｎｔ ｔｏ: ｓｅｃｒｅｔｌｙ ｄｅｔａｉｎ ｃｉｔｉｚｅｎｓ ｄｅｐｏｒｔ ａｌｉｅｎｓ, ｉｎｃｌｕｄｉｎｇ ｔｈｏｓｅ ｗｉｔｈ ｇｒｅｅｎ ｃａｒｄｓ, ｗｈｏ ａｒｅ ｃｏｎｖｉｃｔｅｄ ｏｆ ｄｒｕｇ ｐｏｓｓｅｓｓｉｏｎ ｏｒ ａｎ ａｇｇｒａｖａｔｅｄ ｆｅｌｏｎｙ ａｃｃｅｓｓ ｃｒｅｄｉｔ ｒｅｐｏｒｔｓ ｗｉｔｈｏｕｔ ａ ｓｕｂｐｏｅｎａ ａｂｏｌｉｓｈ ｆｅｄｅｒａｌ ｃｏｕｒｔ ｃｏｎｓｅｎｔ ｄｅｃｒｅｅｓ ｔｈａｔ ｌｉｍｉｔ ｐｏｌｉｃｅ ｓｕｒｖｅｉｌｌａｎｃｅ ｏｆ ｎｏｎ- ｃｒｉｍｉｎａｌ ｏｒｇａｎｉｚａｔｉｏｎｓ ａｎｄ ｅｖｅｎｔｓ ｅａｓｅ ｒｅｓｔｒｉｃｔｉｏｎｓ ｏｎ ｔｈｅ ｕｓｅ ｏｆ ｓｅｃｒｅｔ ｅｖｉｄｅｎｃｅ ｃｏｌｌｅｃｔ ＤＮＡ ｆｒｏｍ ｓｕｓｐｅｃｔｅｄ ｔｅｒｒｏｒｉｓｔｓ ｏｒ ａｎｙ ｉｎｄｉｖｉｄｕａｌ ｗｈｏｓｅ ＤＮＡ ｍｉｇｈｔ ｂｅ ａｂｌｅ ｔｏ ａｓｓｉｓｔ ｉｎｖｅｓｔｉｇａｔｉｏｎｓ Ｓｏｍｅ ｏｆ ｔｈｅ ｐｒｏｖｉｓｉｏｎｓ ｏｆ ｔｈｅｓｅ ａｃｔｓ ｍａｙ ｓｅｅｍ ａｌｌｏｗａｂｌｅ ｉｎ ｔｈｅ ｍｉｓｓｉｏｎ ｔｏ ｃｏｍｂａｔ ｔｅｒｒｏｒｉｓｔ ａｃｔｉｖｉｔｙ. Ｔｈｅ ｑｕｅｓｔｉｏｎ ｉｓ, ｗｈａｔ ｉｓ ｔｈｅ ｄｅｆｉｎｉｔｉｏｎ ｏｆ ａ ｔｅｒｒｏｒｉｓｔ? Ｂｅｃａｕｓｅ ｔｈｅｓｅ ａｃｔｓ ａｌｌｏｗ "ｔｅｒｒｏｒｉｓｔ ｉｎｄｉｖｉｄｕａｌｓ ｏｒ ｇｒｏｕｐｓ" ｔｏ ｂｅ ｄｅｔｅｒｍｉｎｅｄ ｂｙ ｔｈｅ ｄｉｓｃｒｅｔｉｏｎ ｏｆ ａｎ ｉｎｄｉｖｉｄｕａｌ, ａｎｙｏｎｅ ｗｈｏ ｈａｓ ｖｉｅｗｓ ｏｕｔｓｉｄｅ ｏｆ ｗｈａｔ ｔｈｅ ｇｏｖｅｒｎｍｅｎｔ ｄｅｅｍｓ ａｃｃｅｐｔａｂｌｅ ｍａｙ ｂｅ ｃｏｎｓｉｄｅｒｅｄ ａ ｔｅｒｒｏｒｉｓｔ. Ｗｉｌｌ ａｎｔｉ-ｗａｒ ｐｒｏｔｅｓｔｅｒｓ ｂｅ ｓｅｅｎ ａｓ ｔｅｒｒｏｒｉｓｔｓ ｏｒ ｎａｔｉｏｎａｌ ｓｅｃｕｒｉｔｙ ｔｈｒｅａｔｓ? Ｗｉｌｌ ｙｏｕｒ ｎｅｉｇｈｂｏｒ ｗｈｏ ｃｈｅｃｋｓ ｏｕｔ ａ ｂｏｏｋ ｂｅ ｄｅｅｍｅｄ ａ ｔｅｒｒｏｒｉｓｔ? Ｔｈｅ Ａｔｔｏｒｎｅｙ Ｇｅｎｅｒａｌ ａｎｄ ｔｈｅ Ｅｘｅｃｕｔｉｖｅ Ｂｒａｎｃｈ ｏｆ ｔｈｅ ｇｏｖｅｒｎｍｅｎｔ ａｒｅ ｒｅｃｅｉｖｉｎｇ ｈｕｇｅ ａｍｏｕｎｔｓ ｏｆ ｐｏｗｅｒ ｔｈａｔ ｗｉｌｌ ｂｅ ｕｎｃｈｅｃｋｅｄ ｂｙ ｔｈｅ ｏｔｈｅｒ ｇｏｖｅｒｎｍｅｎｔａｌ ｂｒａｎｃｈｅｓ. Ｏｐｐｏｎｅｎｔｓ ｔｏ ｐｏｌｉｔｉｃａｌ ｐｏｗｅｒ ａｎｄ ｏｔｈｅｒ "ｔｈｒｅａｔｓ" ａｒｅ ａｔ ｒｉｓｋ ｏｆ ｂｅｉｎｇ ｓｑｕａｓｈｅｄ, ｄｅｔａｉｎｅｄ ｏｒ ｄｕｂｂｅｄ ｔｅｒｒｏｒｉｓｔｓ. Ｏｕｒ ｄｅｍｏｃｒａｃｙ ｍａｙ ｓｌｏｗｌｙ ｂｅ ｈｅａｄｉｎｇ ｄｏｗｎ ｔｈｅ ｐａｔｈ ｏｆ ｔｏｔａｌｉｔａｒｉａｎｉｓｍ. |
Image of georgetown bookstores
 |
| georgetown bookstores |
georgetown bookstores Image 1
 |
| georgetown bookstores |
georgetown bookstores Image 2
 |
| georgetown bookstores |
georgetown bookstores Image 3
 |
| georgetown bookstores |
georgetown bookstores Image 4
 |
| georgetown bookstores |
georgetown bookstores Image 5
Related blog with georgetown bookstores
- housemd.blogspot.com/...Someplace in Washington.” I stabbed my cheese stick into the marinara sauce. “Georgetown?” I shrugged and leaned back a little as the waitress brought...
- punchbuggyblues.blogspot.com/...to agree with her. Maybe going down to Georgetown and getting her picture taken...the line. Politics and Prose is the best bookstore in the world. I have never seen that...
- thenewdiplomatswife.blogspot.com/...repost something but I just couldn't pass this one up, especially in light of the post of the Georgetown Bookstore closing yesterday, and the one on videos on Monday. Two things...
- workstudies.wordpress.com/... in poverty at the bottom.” The Alta Gracia apparel is now available at the Georgetown University bookstore. To see the Alta Gracia workers themselves explain their hopes for this project...
- christianbookmobile.blogspot.com/... Saturday, September 25, 2010, between 11:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. at Hill Country Bookstore in Georgetown, Texas. To prepare for and promote the event, here is what I've done: ...
- wanderingtaster.blogspot.com/..., used and rare bookstores, and Georgetown University. The beauty of this area... a table and a meal in Georgetown without a loud crowd -- an...
- thedcuniverse.blogspot.com/...eye dog. It was just a dog. Who the hell brings their dog into a bookstore? Even in Georgetown? So I was observing the two of them, wondering...
- mattbg.blogspot.com/...' books, I once went to the childrens' bookstore in downtown Georgetown looking for Christmas gifts and picked out a...
- jeffcrosby.wordpress.com/Signing books in Georgetown. I had my second bookstore booksigning and it was at Hill Country Book Store in Georgetown a couple of ...
- dc20011.blogspot.com/...certainly the fattest Roy Jenkins's wonderful biography of Gladstone. Columbia Bookstore, Cleveland Park and Georgetown. It had an upstairs room on Connecticut Ave., then one on Wisconsin...
Related Video with georgetown bookstores
georgetown bookstores Video 1
georgetown bookstores Video 2
georgetown bookstores Video 3